Projekti (6)

V zadnjih nekaj letih sta IMPEL in Evropska komisija objavila stališča glede krepitve zmogljivosti, zato različni projekti IMPEL zdaj prevzemajo pobudo, da razvijejo svoje zamisli o tem, kako podpreti svoje člane pri izvajanju izdelkov, ki jih zagotavljajo.

Namen projekta je vzpostaviti podlago za razvoj avtonomnih dejavnosti medsebojnega pregleda v nacionalnih mrežah okoljskih organov in agencij. Uporablja se lahko kot instrument za izboljšanje lastne uspešnosti z dialogom, sodelovalnim soočanjem in izmenjavo dobrih praks med kolegi, ki pripadajo isti mreži.

Following the general IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI), this projects aims to make a picture of current situation within Member State or in certain area of the Member State in relation to the implementation and enforcement of EU legislation on nature conservation; mainly the Birds and Habitats Directives. The results are identified good practices and opportunities for improvement.

Pobuda za pregled IMPEL je dolgoročni projekt, namenjen podpori gostiteljskim organizacijam pri izvajanju okoljske zakonodaje EU, učinkovitih orodij in pristopov. Gre za program za krepitev zmogljivosti, v okviru katerega pet strokovnjakov iz organizacij donatoric, vodja skupine in poročevalec pregledajo gostiteljsko organizacijo.

In the last several years IMPEL and the European Commission have issued their positions concerning capacity building and consequently different IMPEL projects are now taking the initiative to develop their ideas on how to support its members in implementing the products that they deliver.

In 2014, the first ‘green’ IRI was executed in Romania. Best practice and opportunities for development were identified. During the course of the IRI, the Romanian National Environmental Guard (NEG) pointed out that certain results of the IRI were cogent in their analysis and that further work should be carried out to help them implement the results. The NEG therefore requested an exchange of knowledge and expertise focusing on, for example, the organisation of environmental and nature protection agencies: should they be separated or merged?