Projektid (4)

Georuumiliste meetodite, nagu ruumilise statistika ja maapinna kaugseire tehnoloogia, kiire areng ning hiljutised edusammud tehisintellekti vallas on suurendanud keskkonnaprotsesside seirevõimet. Viimastel aastakümnetel on hakatud üha enam teadvustama, et georuumiline tehnoloogia võimaldab jälgida, kontrollida ja hinnata keskkonda, andes teavet, mida vajavad õigusloomeasutused, toetades keskkonnakuritegude ja keskkonnaseaduste rikkumiste uurimist. Siiski peavad pädevad asutused kogu ELis välja selgitama, kuidas georuumilise luure abil saadud teave vastab kõige tõhusamalt konkreetsete ökokuritegude uurimise nõuetele, et seda saaks kohtus kasutada.

The project aims to define criteria for the assessment of environmental damage and imminent threat of damage and build technical and procedural capacity in screening cases and determining clues and evidence of environmental damage and threat of damage under the Environmental Liability Directive (ELD), caused by environmental incidents, violations, eco-criminal acts.

There is a diversity of national laws and regulations requiring operators to put in place plans and arrangements to prevent, respond to, and remediate environmental damage as a result of natural and technological incidents. Environment Protection Agencies also operate under a variety of duties and requirements to help operators prevent incidents, and to plan and execute incident and emergency response. This diversity of duties and requirements is likely to have resulted in inconsistent arrangements to prevent, and respond to, environmental incidents.

When sites go into liquidation provisions are generally not made for environmental clean-up and leave substantial environmental legacies which need subsequently to be addressed. Different solutions have been sought across Europe and include the use of insurance policies, financial provisions, and bonds. The issue of insolvency remains and even if provisions are made these are often ignored by the liquidator with the result that nothing is left for the environment as it is seen as subservient to company law. Ultimately lengthy legal battles may still result in the tax payer covering the expense – in direct contradiction of the polluter pays principle.