IRI | IMPEL - Part 2

IRI Slovenia

Number: 2010/01
Status: Finalised
Period: 2010

The IRI scheme is a voluntary scheme providing for informal reviews of environmental authorities in IMPEL Member countries. It was set up to implement the European Parliament and Council Recommendation (2001/331/EC) providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections (RMCEI), where it states: “Member States should assist each other administratively in operating this Recommendation. The establishment by Member States in cooperation with IMPEL of reporting and advice schemes relating...
Read more

Lead Country:
Slovenia

Developing a new IRI Scheme

Number: 2009/02
Status: Finalised
Period: 2009

Tasks were divided amongst a small project team and proposals discussed at a workshop held in London in August 2009. The results of this work are:

Reasons why every country should have an IRI
Proposals on marketing the IRI
Practical information on how to organise a review
A revised and simplified questionnaire

This project recommended that...

IMPEL Review Initiative: Phase 4 9th review: Norway June 2007

Number: 2007/06
Status: Finalised
Period: 2007

This report describes the results of the ninth review of Phase 4 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in June 2007 by the kind co-operation of Norway. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
Norway

IMPEL Review Initiative: Phase 4, 8th Review: UK / Scotland March 2007

Number: 2006/14
Status: Finalised
Period: 2006

This report describes the results of the eighth review of Phase 4 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in March 2005 by the kind co-operation of the UK. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
United Kingdom

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 4: 7th Review: Sweden March 2005

Number: 2005/02
Status: Finalised
Period: 2005

This report describes the results of the seventh review of Phase 4 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in March 2005 by the kind co-operation of Sweden. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
Sweden

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 6th Review: Spain March 2003

Number: 2003/02
Status: Finalised
Period: 2003

This report describes the results of the sixth review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in March 2003 by the kind co-operation of Spain. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
Spain

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 5th Review: Netherlands Nov 2002

Number: 2002/07
Status: Finalised
Period: 2002

This report describes the results of the fifth review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in November 2002 by the kind co-operation of The Netherlands. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
Netherlands

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 4th Review: France Oct 2002

Number: 2002/06
Status: Finalised
Period: 2002

This report describes the results of the fourth review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in October 2002 by the kind co-operation of France. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
France

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 3rd review: Belgium June 2002

Number: 2002/05
Status: Finalised
Period: 2002

This report describes the results of the third review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in June 2002 by the kind co-operation of Belgium. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
All Country Projects

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 2nd review: Ireland March 2002

Number: 2002/04
Status: Finalised
Period: 2002

This report describes the results of the second review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in March 2002 by the kind co-operation of Ireland. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more

Lead Country:
Ireland

Projects - IRI