Filter By

Subcategories Project status: Cluster:
Period:
Show More
6th EAP Accidents Criminal Enforcement Energy Efficiency Enforcement Enforcement cooperation Frequency of Inspection Guidance book illegal waste shipments Inspection IPPC (IED) Directive IRI National Coordinator National Representative Prioritising RMCEI TFS Conference Waste Shipment Regulation waste shipments Water Framework Directive

Projects

Most of the work within IMPEL is done through projects. On this page all IMPEL projects can be found, including a link to the related documents. To start, use the menu on the left sidebar to modify your search.

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 4th Review: France Oct 2002

  • Number: 2002/06
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the fourth review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in October 2002 by the kind co-operation of France. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • France

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 3rd review: Belgium June 2002

  • Number: 2002/05
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the third review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in June 2002 by the kind co-operation of Belgium. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • All Country Projects

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 2nd review: Ireland March 2002

  • Number: 2002/04
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the second review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in March 2002 by the kind co-operation of Ireland. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Ireland

Lessons Learned from Accidents – 2002

  • Number: 2002/03
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This is the report of the 8th seminar on industrial accidents organised for the 4th time within the scope of the European IMPEL network in Dijon in June 2002. In total 16 industrial accidents (in France, U.K., The Netherlands and Belgium) - are described, illustrating the installation, the accident and consequences in detail, origin, causes and circumstances of the accident and the action taken. For more information please visit: http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMPEL-Seminar--3918.html.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • France

Energy Efficiency in Environmental Permits

  • Number: 2002/02
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
In the project the good practices were found in relation to the main objectives. Issues that were addressed are:
  • Practical guidances to clarify and define energy efficiency.
  • Information exchange between operator and authorities to create good permit applications.
  • Concrete examples of more or less binding permit conditions.
  • The use the BREFs
  • Self-monitoring under the precondition that the inspector can influence the monitoring practices of the...

Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Finland

Implementing Article 10 of the SEA Directive 2001/42/EC

  • Number: 2002/01
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
One of the main conclusions drawn by the working group is that scope, depth and way of monitoring depend very much on the characteristics of each type of plan or programme. Article 10 of the SEA Directive refrains from laying down detailed requirements and leaves thus enough flexibility to develop flexible and individual solutions adapted to the respective type of plan and programme. However, the importance of starting monitoring on the grounds of baseline environmental information has been recognised...
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Germany

Comparison programme: Condoning – Compliance promotion – Communication – ISO/EMAS – One page permits

  • Number: 2001/05
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2001
The Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment from the Netherlands hosted the third Comparison Programme in the new series. The Netherlands called inspectors from the EU countries and inspectors from the candidate AC countries to participate in the Comparison Programme on October 25th up to October 28th in Haarlem capital city of the province of North Holland. During the programme and at the end of the meeting the participants were asked to give their opinion on the Programme, the content...
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Netherlands

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 1st review: Germany Oct 2001

  • Number: 2001/04
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2001
This report describes the results of the first review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in October 2001 by the kind co-operation of Germany. The findings of the test review are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities, and in terms of the opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Germany

Lessons Learned from Accidents – 2001

  • Number: 2001/03
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2001
These series of seminars organised by France are focused on the examination of past accidents which have had an impact on the environment can be useful for several purposes. It can help to improve organisations concerned with prevention and the equipment they use, to evaluate the consequences of potential accidents, to develop strategies to combat accidents, to identify new weak spots and to estimate the cost of accidents.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • France

Best Practices in Compliance Monitoring

  • Number: 2001/02
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2001
Compliance monitoring is a fundamental activity within environmental protection and is one of the main ways by which adherence to limits and laws can be assessed for regulatory purposes. It can involve a range of inspection and reporting activities carried out to determine compliance with regulatory requirements. The information provided by compliance monitoring is also valuable for other environmental and management activities (e.g.for optimising processes, protecting sensitive ecosystems, and informing...
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Ireland