Filter By

Subcategories Project status: Cluster:
Period:
Show More
6th EAP Accidents Criminal Enforcement Energy Efficiency Enforcement Enforcement cooperation Frequency of Inspection Guidance book illegal waste shipments Inspection IPPC (IED) Directive IRI National Coordinator National Representative Prioritising RMCEI TFS Conference Waste Shipment Regulation waste shipments Water Framework Directive

Projects - 2002

Comparison programme: Self Monitoring and Electronic Reporting – Pulp and paper production

  • Number: 2002/09
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report summarises the results of the Finnish Comparison Programme II. This comparison programme was the fourth programme executed in this new series and a follow-up of the first Finnish Comparison Programme I. The programme encompassed two themes: self-monitoring and electronic reporting of emissions data. The objectives of this second Comparison Programme was to give an in-depth view on self-monitoring and electronic reporting based on information on detailed practical working methods and on...
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Finland

IMPEL Guidance on Compliance with Point VIII of the Recommendation

  • Number: 2002/08
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This IMPEL Guidance Document, being limited to the 2nd report in 2003 under Point VIII 1), is intended to support the provision of the information specified in Point VIII 2) of the Recommendation. It is non-binding on inspecting authorities within IMPEL. It is not intended to prescribe how the Commission and MSs respond to Point VIII but to assist IMPEL members and MSs to respond to the one-off request for information under Point VIII in a consistent manner.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • n/a

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 5th Review: Netherlands Nov 2002

  • Number: 2002/07
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the fifth review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in November 2002 by the kind co-operation of The Netherlands. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Netherlands

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 4th Review: France Oct 2002

  • Number: 2002/06
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the fourth review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in October 2002 by the kind co-operation of France. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • France

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 3rd review: Belgium June 2002

  • Number: 2002/05
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the third review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in June 2002 by the kind co-operation of Belgium. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • All Country Projects

IMPEL Review Initiative, Phase 3: 2nd review: Ireland March 2002

  • Number: 2002/04
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This report describes the results of the second review of Phase 3 of the IMPEL Review Initiative (IRI) Project. This review was carried out in March 2002 by the kind co-operation of Ireland. These findings are set out in terms of examples of good practice for other Member State Inspecting Authorities and in terms of opportunities for development by the host Inspecting Authority. Further lessons for the review process were also noted and are recorded in the report.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Ireland

Lessons Learned from Accidents – 2002

  • Number: 2002/03
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
This is the report of the 8th seminar on industrial accidents organised for the 4th time within the scope of the European IMPEL network in Dijon in June 2002. In total 16 industrial accidents (in France, U.K., The Netherlands and Belgium) - are described, illustrating the installation, the accident and consequences in detail, origin, causes and circumstances of the accident and the action taken. For more information please visit: http://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMPEL-Seminar--3918.html.
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • France

Energy Efficiency in Environmental Permits

  • Number: 2002/02
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
In the project the good practices were found in relation to the main objectives. Issues that were addressed are:
  • Practical guidances to clarify and define energy efficiency.
  • Information exchange between operator and authorities to create good permit applications.
  • Concrete examples of more or less binding permit conditions.
  • The use the BREFs
  • Self-monitoring under the precondition that the inspector can influence the monitoring practices of the...

Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Finland

Implementing Article 10 of the SEA Directive 2001/42/EC

  • Number: 2002/01
  • Status: Finalised
  • Period: 2002
One of the main conclusions drawn by the working group is that scope, depth and way of monitoring depend very much on the characteristics of each type of plan or programme. Article 10 of the SEA Directive refrains from laying down detailed requirements and leaves thus enough flexibility to develop flexible and individual solutions adapted to the respective type of plan and programme. However, the importance of starting monitoring on the grounds of baseline environmental information has been recognised...
Read more
  • Lead Country:
  • Germany